The Kite Runner And The Animal Farm - 1804 Words

Good morning viewers, ladies and gentlemen. I welcome you to the Iheart radio of books analysis represent through speaking of it oppression. As part of our weekly program, the theme of our literature analysis is oppression. Oppression is defined as a situation in which people are governed in an unfair and cruel way and prevented from having oppurnities and freedom it also can be in a situation way a particular powerful person is oppressing a particular person with less power. For those who are involve in a society that the governed is are unfair and rule in a cruel way are known as the oppressed and those who are with the power and privilege are known as the oppressor. Oppression can be identified in many ways, they are gender oppression, race oppression, politic oppression, religion oppression and physical oppression. However today we will be discussing about physical oppression, ethnic oppression and religion oppression along with the political oppression. The two text we going examine as part of our literature program are the kite runner and the animal farm. Even though both book is composed of different story however it still mainly focus on political oppression and racial oppression. The similarities and difference between these two books on the knowledge of the oppression will be analysed. The literature can create a picture of the oppression in the reader mind and represent oppression through positioning them to reflect and view the convey oppression that the authorShow MoreRelatedThe, As You Like It, And Khaled Hosseini s The Kite Runner1486 Words   |  6 Pagesthe larger world. These connections help to develop a sense of affinity to a person’s surroundings, thus strengthening both one’s sense of belonging, and sense of self. Both William Shakespeare’s comedy, As You Like It, and Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner, explore the concept of belonging and it’s varying aspects based on different so cial contexts, the perspectives of belonging being shaped by personal context, and the importance of family orientated relationships in developing one’s sense of identityRead MoreGp Essay Mainpoints24643 Words   |  99 Pages †¢ Environmental problems nowadays due to scientific inventions in the past (industrial revolution) †¢ Thomas Watson â€Å"I think there’s a world market for about five computers† Nature of ethics subjective vs. Nature of science objective †¢ Animals: rights or soul? †¢ No unified system of ethics †¢ Diversified views and varying moral stands †¢ E.g. embryonic stem cell research: varying models of ‘ensoulment’ ( rights of foetus (US embryo older than 14 days) †¢ Debate alone couldRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesauthorities felt that the prisoner was basically uncooperative, they manacled his hands behind his back and chained his ankles, which made him completely dependent on his cellmates for the fulï ¬ llment of his basic needs. It was this reduction to an animal-like existence in front of other humans which constituted the ultimate humiliation and led most reliably to the destruction of the prisoner’s image of himself. Even in his own eyes he became something that was not worthy of the regard of his fellow

A Database Problem Before Recommending Sql, Nosql Or Bigdata

1. What things would you want to know about a database problem before recommending a SQL or NoSQL or BigData solution, that would help you make that recommendation? Ans) The things that we consider before recommending SQL, NoSQL or BigData are: Scalability: NoSQL databases are designed to expand transparently and horizontally to take advantage of new nodes, and designed with low-cost hardware. SQL have problems in Scalability. Data Capability: RDBMS are intolerable for large data volumes. NoSQL distributed databases, allow data to be spread across thousands of servers and can store large volume of data. Maintaining is Cheaper: Maintaining RDBMS systems is expensive and need highly trained DBAs. On the other hand, NoSQL databases require†¦show more content†¦Ans) SQL is considered a better choice because of following reasons: †¢ SQL will be a best fit where we need 100% consistency of data, such as most of financial problems which cannot be achieved by NoSQL database. †¢ SQL offers more efficient access control and permission management tools and offers better performance in data collection. †¢ SQL offers data compression techniques so that data size can be reduced. †¢ SQL offers strong authentication and access protection and has better password management too. †¢ SQL automatically updates security patches to reduce maintenance costs. 3. Describe in a few sentences a business or computational problem you would want to solve with a NoSQL database, and what makes NoSQL a better choice in this case? Ans) NoSQL database are better choice when we have tables whose size is in TB, PB ets.., and most of their data is not inter-related so they can just treat them as key value pairs. With NoSQL data can be distributed across several nodes across countries i.e Sharding. NoSQL support auto-sharding, means that they automatically spread data across an arbitrary number of servers. NoSQL databases are more scalable and provide superior performance, and their data model addresses several issues that the relational model is not designed to address: †¢ Large volumes of structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data †¢ Agile sprints,

Antonin Dvorak was a Pariotic, Classical Music Composer

Does the idea of a patriotic classical music composer sound a little odd? Believe it or not, the talented Antonin Dvorak was one such composer. Born in Czechoslovakia, his works were largely inspired by the multitude of folk music presented in his home land, and also by the incredible Christian Reformer John Huss. Even though he was a Czech, he did live in America for about 3 years, and from here he created one of his best works: From the New World symphony. Overall, he can be considered a very key composer in the Romantic period of music. The famed Czech composer, Antonin Dvorak, was born in a Bohemian village of Czechoslovakia on September 8th, 1841 (Carlson Smith, 154). After several years of living and learning music in his home village, eventually Dvorak moved to Prague at the age of 16 to continue his education in music. Pursuing his studies diligently, and after working various odd jobs, he eventually became a professor of music at the Prague Conservatory (Pogue Speck, 64) . While in Prague, he married his lovely wife Anna Cermakova in the November of 1873, and was happily married for the rest of his life to her (Encyclopedia Britannica). Performing all over Prague, eventually Dvorak’s incredible work was discovered by the famed composer Johannes Brahms, who recommended Dvorak to Brahms’ publisher Simrock. Simrock took to liking Dvorak’s works so much, that he agreed to publish works like the Moravian Duets in 1876, and the Slavonic Dances in 1878. These works

The Character of Marc Antony in Julius Caesar - 773 Words

Blending into the ground, waiting for the perfect moment to lash out, and then attacking when an opportunity presents itself, snakes hunt the same way some people do politics. In Rome, 44 BC, when one man fell prey, another man, camouflaged, found his opportunity to strike. As William Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar progresses, the character of Marc Antony slowly reveals that he is not who he at first seems, a cunning manipulator rather than a blindly obedient lapdog. Antony, when he is introduced in Act 1 is running a traditional race on the Lupercal and is asked to touch Calpurnia by Caesar, who is referring to a superstition at the time that the touch of a runner in the race could cause a woman to be fertile. Antony responds to this†¦show more content†¦Interestingly, Antony is completely absent from Act 2. This second Act is the one in which the Cassius and the conspirators against Caesar are recruiting Brutus. In the entire Act, Antony receives a single mention, when Brutus finally agrees to help the conspirators, and they are debating whether to kill him along with Caesar. In this argument, Cassius wants to kill him because he has close ties to their target, while Brutus stands in his defense, calling him â€Å"but a limb† maintaining that he wouldn’t be able to oppose them without Caesar. Every single conspirator, with the partial exception of Cassius completely underestimates Antony because he is so loyal to Caesar, and would seemingly not be able to function without him. Yet, they disregard the fact that Antony is a general of the Roman army, a position that requires no small measure of independent thought in itself. Again, Marc Antony is viewed as a minor character in Act 2. The conspirators disregard him, not only in functionality once Caesar is dead, but as an ally. And, even though, they never try to recruit him, they don’t try to ruin his reputation or disgrace him, anything to take his power. They simply don’t view him as a threat, with the exception of Cassius, who is overridden. Act 3 is the Act in which Caesar is murdered.Show MoreRelatedJulius Caesar: Not a Great Leader Essay704 Words   |  3 Pagesforces in the play Julius Caesar are the characters Marcus Brutus, Julius Caesar, and Marc Antony. Julius Caesar is the center of the ordeal of leadership in Rome when the play begins. When Caesar returns to Rome he is looked upon by the fickle plebeians as a glorious and triumphant hero. The authority of his heroism is questioned when the honorable Marcus Brutus speaks to the townspeople during Caesar’s funeral. Brutus proves to be the better leader for Rome rather than Caesar or Antony. Brutus is wiserRead MoreMarcus Brutus Vs Mark Antony s Funeral Speech Essay1135 Words   |  5 Pagesfuneral of Julius Caesar two characters make speeches to the plebeian mob, Brutus and Marc Antony. Shakespeare shows us the personalities of the two orators and gives one an advantage over the other. Marc Antony has an advantage over Brutus because he speaks after Brut us and he has Caesar’s body. He also interrupts Brutus’ speech. He uses a range of rhetorical devices to manipulate the crowd. Both characters make very powerful speeches that will eventually determine who rules Rome. Both characters beginRead More The Ambitious Marc Antony in Julius Caesar996 Words   |  4 Pages The Ambitious Marc Antony in Julius Caesar nbsp; The tragic and untimely death of Julius Caesar, a condemned Roman tyrant, triggered William Shakespeares creativity. In his play Julius Caesar Shakespeare writes of the treacherous conspirators, Marcus Brutus and Caius Cassius, and their plans to assassinate their Roman leader, Julius Caesar. The story continues to explain how Caesars loyal friend, Marc Antony, helps avenge the brutal murder. After Antony receives soldiers to fightRead MoreA Historical Overview Of Julius Caesar Essay1452 Words   |  6 PagesA Historical Overview of Julius Caesar (Shakespeare style) The fate of a nation determined by one man. With classic alliances and betrayals, the tale of Julius Caesar is still regarded as one of the greatest betrayals in human history. The fate of Rome was heading toward a dictatorship. Only the Roman Republic could stop Julius Caesar from ruling Rome. Little did the Roman Republic know that this assassination would later cause Octavian Caesar to become the first Emperor of the Roman Empire in 27Read MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Julius Caesar 884 Words   |  4 PagesGustav Berner Mrs. Hillard Honors English 10 - F 15 January 2015 Julius Caesar Discussion 1.) Brutus’ trust in others and his love of Rome are his greatest faults. His tragic flaw is the trust he places in others. Brutus is easily swayed to trust Cassius when he plots to kill Caesar. Cassius uses his cunning to trick Brutus into believing Caesar is ambitious and that he is killing Caesar for the good of Rome. Cassius says to Brutus, â€Å"Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world like a Colossus, andRead MoreJulius Caesar Essay On The Truth938 Words   |  4 Pagesrelevant concept in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, a story showing the stabbing of an uprising leader and the conflict that occurs following the event. More specifically, the idea of truthfulness is especially common regarding the character Marc Antony. William Shakespeare uses the underestimated and loyal character Marc Antony to suggest the theme that a person’s true values is often revealed through conflict. Shakespeare creates the characters in such a manner that they often underestimateRead MoreOctavian and Marc Antony- The Duel of Words and Deeds1091 Words   |  4 PagesOctavian and Marc Antony- The Duel of Words and Deeds Following the Julius Caesars death at the hands of the Senate, Octavian and Marc Antony propelled themselves to the pinnacle of Roman power. First joining together during the Second Triumvirate, these men represented the true power players of Roman politics. As their alliance fractured, both Romans resorted to propaganda to gain an edge over the other. Through insulting the other and polishing their own image, both Antony and Octavian lookedRead MoreThe Tragic Hero Of Marcus Junius Brutus Minor Essay1418 Words   |  6 PagesLepidus; his mother was the half-sister of Cato the Younger, and later Julius Caesar s mistress. Some sources refer to the possibility of Caesar being his real father,despite Caesar s being only 15 years old when Brutus was born. Brutus uncle, Quintus Servilius Caepio, adopted him in about 59 BC, and Brutus was known officially for a time as Quintus Servilius Caepio Brutus before he reverted to using his birth-name. Following Caesar s assassination in 44 BC, B rutus revived his adoptive name in orderRead MoreThe Tragedy of Julius Caesar: Compare and Contrast Marc Antony, Cassius, and Brutus641 Words   |  3 PagesMarc Antony, Brutus, and Cassius are all critical characters in William Shakespeare’s famous play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Due to their distinctive personalities and values, there is no trait that all of these characters share, although they do share some traits with one another. Firstly, Marc Antony and Cassius are manipulative in nature, while Brutus is not. Secondly, the root of Brutus and Cassius’ failure is their personality flaw, while Marc Antony proves strong in all the ways they proveRead MoreJulius Caesar by William Shakespeare646 Words   |  3 Pagestragedies is the story of Julius Caesar. In this story, the main character, Julius Caesar, is plotted against his best friend, Brutus, and the head of the conspiracy, Cassius. After Caesar gets assassinated, his right hand man, Mark Antony, tries to get revenge on the people that killed him. However, in this particular story, the main character is not the tragic hero. The tragic hero, Brutus, is the most consistent throughout the play unlike the other three characters, Caesar, Antony, and Cassius. Considering

Cfa- Economics Free Essays

ADS It has two variables, share price S and time t. However, there is a second derivative only with respect to the share price and only a first derivative with respect to time. In finance, these type equations have been around since the early seventies, thanks to Fischer Black and Myron Schools. We will write a custom essay sample on Cfa- Economics or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, equations of this form are very common in physics Physicists refer to them as heat or diffusion equations. These equations have been known In physics for almost two centuries and, naturally. Scientists have learnt a great deal about them. Among numerous applications of these equations in natural sciences, the classic examples are the models of Diffusion of one material within another, like smoke particles in air, or water pollutions; Flow of heat from one part of an object to another. This is about as much I wanted to go into physics of the BBS equation. Now let us concentrate on finance. What Is The Boundary Condition? As I have already mentioned, the BBS equation does not say which financial instrument it describes. Therefore, the equation alone is not sufficient for valuing derivatives. There must be some additional information provided. This additional information is called the boundary conditions. Boundary conditions determine initial or final values of some financial product that evolves over time according to the PDP. Usually, they represent some contractual clauses of various derivative securities. Depending on the product and the problem at hand, boundary conditions would change. When we are dealing with derivative contracts, which have a termination date, the most natural boundary conditions are terminal values of the contracts. For example, the boundary condition for a European call Is the payoff function V(SST,T) = Max( SST-DE) at expiration. In financial problems, it is also usual to specify the behavior of the elution at SO and as S . For example, It is clear that when the share value S , the value of a put option should go to zero. To summaries, equipped with the right boundary conditions. It Is possible using some techniques to solve the BBS equation 1 OFF tort various financial instruments. There are a number tot deterrent solution method one of which I now would like to describe to you. Transformation To Constant Coefficient Diffusion Equations Physics students may find this subsection interesting. Sometimes it can be useful to transform the basic BBS equation into something a little bit simpler by a change of variables. For example, instead of the function V(S,t), we can introduce a new function according to the following rule V(S,t) = e ¤x +  ¤Ã‚ ¶LLC(X, 6) where or oh=-1 02 – 10, 2 -0 or 10. 000142 Then IS(x, 6) satisfies the basic diffusion equation D U D 21. 1 = 2 . DXL It is a good exercise to check (using your week 8) that the above change of variables equation. This equation looks much simpler that can be important, for example when simple numerical schemes. Previous ‘partial derivative exercises’ f mom r indeed gives rise to the standard diffusion than the original BBS equation. Sometimes seeking closed-form lotions, or in some Green’s Functions One solution of the BBS equation, which plays a significant role in option pricing, is 1 You can also read about this transformation in the original paper by Black and Schools, a copy of which you can get from me. 7 ? expo 0 for any S’. (Exercise: verify this by substituting back into the BBS equation. ) This solution behaves in an unusual way as time t approaches expiration T. You can see that in this limit, the exponent goes to zero everywhere, except at S=S’, when the solution explodes. This limit is known as a Doric delta function: lime G(S , t) * 6 (S , S Don not confuse this delta function with the delta of delta hedging! ) Think of this as a function that is zero everywhere except at one point, S=S’, where it is infinite. One of the properties of is that its integral is equal to one: +m Another very important property en De TA-donation is where f(S) is an arbitrary function. Thus, the delta-function ‘picks up’ the value of f at the point, where the delta-function is singular, I. E. At S’=S. How all of this can help us to value financial derivatives? You will see it in a moment. The expression G(S,t) is a solution of the BBS equation for any S’. Because of the linearity of the BBS equation, we can multiply G(S,t) by any constant, and we get another solution. But then we can also get another solution by adding together expressions of the form G(S,t) but with different values for S’. Putting this together, and taking an integral as Just a way of adding together many solutions, we find that V (S ,t)= If(S (S , t)ads ‘ o m is also a solution of the BBS equation for arbitrary function f(S’). Now if we choose the arbitrary function f(S’) to be the payoff function of a given derivative problem, then V(S,t) becomes the value of the option. The function G(S,t) is called the Green’s function. The formula above gives the exact solution for the option value in terms of the arbitrary payoff function. For example, the value of a European call is given by the following integral c(S , t) = f Max( S E (S , t) ads Let us check that as t approaches T the above call option gives the correct payoff. As we mentioned this before, in the limit when t goes to T, the Green’s function becomes a delta-function. Therefore, taking the limit we get T , T) = I Max( S E T , S ‘)ads Max( SST -E ,0). Here we used the property of the delta-function. Thus, the proposed solution for the call option does satisfy the required boundary condition. Formula For A Call Normally, in financial literature you see a formula for European options written in terms of cumulative normal distribution functions. You may therefore wonder how the exact result given above in terms of the Green’s function is related to the ones in the literature. Now I’d like to explain how these two results are related. Let us first focus on a European call. Let us look at the formula for a call c(S , f Max( S E (S , t)ads We integrate from O to infinity. But it is clear that when S’ How to cite Cfa- Economics, Papers

Pro-Gun Speech free essay sample

Imagine you are in your house, it’s nighttime, and you are about to turn in for the night. Suddenly, you hear a sound from the front door, but you’re not expecting anybody. You become suspicious and worry, for what awaits behind the door? You fear for your family, your little three-year-old baby girl. As an instinct, as a parent, what is the first thing you grab? Not your son’s baseball bat or your golf club, what if the intruder is a burly, six foot tall man? Anything aside from your dependable gun, you feel, would be ineffective to the safekeeping of your precious family and security of your loving home.You grab your gun and stand in front of your family. Your spouse begins to cry and holds your children tightly within their arms. Suddenly you hear a pound, a crisp crackle, and a shout from behind you. We will write a custom essay sample on Pro-Gun Speech or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page You hear the intruder stalk down the hall to the room where you and your family wait, and soon he stands facing you in the doorway. The door creaks open, you hear a click from his gun, and he opens the door. He looks at you, and he realizes you have a gun pointed at his chest. He begins to run away. Now, at this point, would you not be glad that you had this reliable gun?Guns aren’t the catalyst of crime ladies and gentlemen. Criminals are. The problem is NOT the gun control, but the criminal control. Don’t you agree that any disturbed person is far more dangerous than a loaded gun? A gun is predictable, while a disturbed person is not. To begin with, guns aren’t the ONLY source of crime in America. There are many fatal car accidents as well, and they kill around 40,000 people annually, so should we ban cars too? Should anything and everything that causes deaths be banned as well?The government and the anti-gun lobby need to understand that guns should not be blamed for everything and people should be trusted with guns. No matter which tool is used in the homicide, the bottom line remains the same. Weapons do not kill people; people kill people. Moreover, just because gun laws are made tighter then they already are doesn’t mean that crime levels will go down. For example, Washington D. C. has had a handgun ban for over thirty years, yet they are known as the â€Å"murder capital† of the United States. The truth is criminals won’t follow the laws—that’s kind of what makes them criminals.As Thomas Jefferson said, â€Å"The laws that forbid the carrying of guns disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Can it be supposed that those who have the courage to violate the most sacred laws of humanity†¦will respect the less important ones†¦such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants. They serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. † Finally, the right to keep and bear arms may make citizens more responsible and trustworthy.For example, to have a firearm in your possession, it takes a tremendous amount of self-control to stop yourself from shooting someone or something randomly. It also takes responsibility to keep track of the gun and make sure that it does not fall into the wrong hands. A true American would make sure to keep the gun hidden if taken into public, and make sure that the gun isn’t stolen. Lastly, owning a gun could make anyone a better person because having a gun in their home would give them a sense of reassurance, which would most likely lead to a good nights sleep.Others who do not own a gun are often kept up by common noises they hear next door, thinking that a robber is at their doorstep. I have personal experience with that. The day after Christmas a couple years ago, a robbery took place in my home. The robber(s) stole all of my parent’s valuable possessions, and though my room looked as if it were rummaged through, my items were untouched. My family was lucky we weren’t home at the time. However, in the nights following I do admit that my family was extremely paranoid and worried that the robber(s) would come again.It was at this time that I wished my family had a gun to prevent any more robberies/break-ins. I would spend hours in bed, often up till 3 A. M. thinking about it, and making me incapable of concentrating on anything the next day. If we had a gun though, I would be a little less paranoid and I would definitely get a better sleep. My opponents may tell you that new laws made to control guns are proven to reduce crime and homicide rates. Well, if this fact is true, why is it that Washington D. C. ’s crime rate is 69 per 100,000 due to gun bans, and Indianapolis’ rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to a lack of gun control.

Nineteen Eighty-four and People free essay sample

Imagine living in a world where politics are everything and all forms of individuality and personal identities are shattered. A world where everybody is stripped of their rights to talk, act, think, or even form their own opinions, simply because they do not agree with the government’s beliefs. These aspects are just a few of the examples of things dictators would have control over in a totalitarianism form of government. Aggressive leaders such as Hitler and Joseph Stalin are examples of such dictators. They used their power for terror and murder, and their motive is simply to maximize their own personal power. George Orwell had witnessed World War II, the fall of Hitler and Stalin’s dictatorships, and the fatal outcomes that have come from these governments. To warn future generations of the harsh effects of totalitarianism governments, he wrote the book Nineteen Eighty-Four. Published in 1946, Nineteen Eighty-Four describes life in a totalitarianism form of government, following the main character, Winston Smith, as he takes risks in discovering how he believes life should truly be. We will write a custom essay sample on Nineteen Eighty-four and People or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Literary critic Irving Howe states, â€Å"Were it possible, in the world of 1984, to show human character in anything resembling genuine freedom it would not be the world of 1984† (62). In Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, the government uses its power to suppress individuality among the people. To begin, the author shows how the government abolishes individuality through the use of mind control. First of all, the creation of Newspeak restricts the individual from saying things that he/she wishes to say. More specifically, the task of the Party’s philologists is to regulate the vocabulary and language of Oceania to ultimately be able to control the actions and behaviors of the people. Literary critic Stephen Ingle argues, â€Å"The more vocabulary contracts, the more the Party will be able to control behavior† (124). Since the Party has complete control over how the people can talk and what they are allowed to say, they ultimately have the power to control how they act. Through Newspeak, thoughtcrime will become impossible due to the fact that there will be no terms in which to express it. Furthermore, the Party asserts its control over the mind through doublethink. To begin, doublethink is an example of a thought process in which one simultaneously holds two contradictory beliefs while accepting both of them. For example, while in the Ministry of Love, O’Brien uses doublethink to make Winston believe that he can float. Winston says, â€Å"If he thinks he floats off the floor and I simultaneously think I see him do it, then it happens† (Orwell 278). O’Brien cannot float, however through the use of doublethink Winston can say that it does happen. Moreover, the Party also uses thoughtcrime to regulate the people’s thoughts, speech, actions, and feelings towards the government. The Thought Police use psychology and surveillance such as hidden telescreens to discover cases of thoughtcrime and misbehavior. For instance, a telescreen hidden behind a picture on the wall in Winston and Julia’s secret hideout is the reason they are caught in their illegal love affair. Winston describes, â€Å"Thoughtcrime does not entail death: Thoughtcrime IS death† (Orwell 27). Winston is saying that death is definite if one thinks badly about the government or disapproves of the government’s actions. Thus, due to telescreens, people are forced to keep an expression of optimism at all times; because any other emotion will be considered treason (Ingle 127). Consequently, individuality among the people is destroyed through mind control. In addition to mind control, Orwell also illustrates how the government strips the people of their personal identities though their control over reality. To begin, the party uses its power over Oceania’s history to eliminate all records of the past in order to create a future entirely dedicated to politics. Winston states, â€Å"History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right. I know, of course, that the past is falsified, but it would never be possible for me to prove it† (Orwell 155). The Party has complete control over the history of Oceania, and they choose to delete any and all traces of the past, such as memories. Additionally, the Party uses their control over memories to minimize individuality in the people of Oceania. More specifically, the Party seeks to control the memory of the people because without memory, they cannot remember the past. They remove all documents and records of the past through their memory holes. It is one’s memories that keep the past existing and that shape their lives (Ingle 123). The Party succeeds in abolishing the past by restricting the memories of the people. Moreover, the government reduces individuality with their perceptions of logic. In Oceania, whatever the Party says is correct is correct. If one does not agree with what the Party says, he/she is considered insane; a flaw in the system. To explain, when Winston is taken to the Ministry of Love, they torture him-physically and emotionally to make him accept the logic of the Party. Powerful party member O’Brien explains to Winston that their logic is correct, regardless of what Winston knows is right. O’Brien implores, â€Å"Sometimes they are five. Sometimes they are three. Sometimes they are all of them at once. You must try harder. It is not easy to become sane† (Orwell 207). O’Brien is saying that the government has the ability to alter aspects of their lives that Winston knows are the real thing; however he has no choice but to accept them. He is considered â€Å"insane† because he knows what is right and what is wrong and is hesitant to believe that the Party’s logic is true. Noted critic Stephen Ingle implies, â€Å"Winston conjectures that in the end the Party would declare that two plus two made five and the individual would be required to believe it† (122). In the future, there will be no other types of logic other that what the Party deems to be true. Thus, the government uses its power to control all aspects of reality for the people of Oceania. Equally important to mind control and reality, Orwell also shows how the government’s control over the people’s emotions suppresses their individuality. To begin, the Party extinguishes all forms of pure love among the people. More specifically, if two people wish to get married, they must be approved. If they wish to marry out of love and affection, they will be denied. In the eyes of the Party, marriage must be handled like business-only to produce offspring that will be loyal to them. Winston implores, â€Å"But you could not have pure love or pure lust nowadays. No emotion was pure, because everything was mixed up with fear and hatred† (Orwell 105). Every aspect of the people’s lives in Oceania is robotic and systematic, there are no true emotions. Similarly to the Party’s control over love, they also control sex between the people. To explain, the Party believes that there should not be any pleasure from sex; it should only be used in order to reproduce. The people who are faithful to the party transform their sexual energy into political hysteria (Howe 65). All of their energy goes towards the Two Minutes Hate and their hatred for Big Brother in order to bring some form of unity amongst them. Furthermore, the Party also uses emotional torture to abolish individuality. To justify, when Winston is in the Ministry of Love, he endures not only physical torture but psychological torture as well. He says, â€Å"In the end the nagging voices broke him down more completely than the boats and fists of the guards† (Orwell 200). The emotional torture from the questioning Winston undergoes wears him down and makes him into a mouth that simply utters what he believes they want to hear. The questioners transform him into something that is not even human anymore- merely just a robot. Literary expert Stephen Ingle argues that â€Å"the right and capacity to form one’s own judgment on external events†¦a full emotional life, a private world into which one could retire: those were the bastions of identity which Winston Smith sought to defend† (127). Winston is the last individual with knowledge of things outside of what the Party believes to be moral, and eventually he is stripped from that title and made into one of the other brain-washed citizens of Oceania. Consequently, the Party uses emotional torture to suppress individuality among the people. Hence, the government in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four has been proven to use their power to strip the citizens of their individuality. For instance, the Party uses their control to take over the minds of the people and restrict what they can/cannot say or do. Also, they have the power to control all records of the past, memories, and the logic they have placed in their society. If that is not enough, the Party also controls their emotions, regulates sex, and forces emotional torture among them to force their logic into their brains. Orwell is â€Å"trying to present the kind of world in which individuality has become obsolete and personality a crime† (Howe 62). Ultimately, if a society allows a dictatorship in which one person or a group of people have all the power over the citizens, the society will transform into an individualized group of robots.